"I said it was a bit of a personal present to get from a bodyguard. She replied very simply: 'He was my lover'. When Charles had resumed his affair with Camilla, Diana had turned to Barry. She said other members of the Royal Family had had affairs with their bodyguards and Barry had been her friend when she felt friendless. She also said that she loved him and that they took him away. He was moved to other duties so she no longer saw him. Several months passed and one day she and Charles were in an official car on their way to the airport when he said in a matter-of-fact way: 'Oh, I don't know if you've heard, but Sergeant Mannakee is dead'. Diana, now in tears herself, said that she just collapsed and Charles did nothing to comfort her.
"She held on to me. 'They killed him. I'm certain they killed him'.
"I asked her who "they" were but she was too distressed to give a coherent answer. 'MI5, people in the Palace, somebody who wanted him out of the way'.
"I had read about Sergeant Mannakee's death. It was as a passenger in a motorcycle accident - not an easy murder to stage, although not an impossible one".

1391 Also posted to: Home page . At: 1:25:54 PM  . .
Permalink  Top  Search Google  Technorati
Other title(s) for this story: Extract from James Hewitt book

From The Guardian: "In the past nobody would have dared [to do this]," Mr Clifford said. "But [Diana's former butler, Paul Burrell] has, and is getting away with it. Now if you're earning £9,000 a year and see a chance to set up your family with a large cash sum, then more and more people are going to think about it. "When anybody is surrounded by servants, the likelihood is that there are lots of things those servants will have witnessed which would be embarrassing. I can't find the foreign press stories they talk about, except this one mentioned by The Independent - a Swiss gay newspaper, but from what I've gathered from the TV, Charlie must have been sucking a servant's (probably Michael Fawcett's) dick or something of that ilk or maybe involved in the gay rape. Would that be enough to bring down the royal house - I really hope so. But then as an anti-monarchist I would say that wouldn't I. And on a related note: Charles' spokesman said the person behind the mysterious allegations has suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and alcoholism. "He has in the past made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated." Well, they would say that wouldn't they!

From the Sunday Mirror in March this year: Princess Diana made a sensational secret video diary in which she complained that Charles had an "unhealthy relationship" with top aide Michael Fawcett, the Sunday Mirror can reveal.

Diana, looking tearful and drawn, complains on camera: "He is too close to Fawcett - what can one do when your husband is in an unhealthy relationship" with a servant?

She also tells how Charles and his close aide appeared "uncomfortable" and "uneasy" after being disturbed while together in one of the Prince's private rooms.

From Throneout: There are actually 2 allegations. The first is that a senior and close aide to a senior royal is alleged to have male raped George Smith, another palace servant. George Smith later reported the alleged attack to Police and it is suggested that the claims have been recorded on various video tapes possibly by Diana. George Smith later withdrew his complaint when questioned by Police. He was also given a £38,000 pay off by Prince Charles, apparently unconnected with the withdrawl of his complaint. The second allegation is that a senior and close aide to a senior royal [Fawcett] was found in bed with that royal [Charlie] by a servant [Smith?]. Both the royal and the servant are male. This allegation is also said to have been recorded by Diana. As with the Burrell trial, it appears that legal precedent and the rule of law is being discarded to keep the Windsor's dirty secrets secret a little longer. Clearly revelation of such a secret, and the fact that Diana was collating evidence of these secrets that the Palace is so keen to hide, will further speculation that Diana's death was no accident. Some have suggested that this evidence may have formed part of a custody battle, if Diana had have lived long enough.

And while I'm at it, there's a new book out in the US that the National Enquirer is serialising which says that Prince Harry is James Hewitt's son, not Prince Charles'. Looking at him he looks a little unlike other royals... This and some of the above was why they killer her. And this is the reason there's such a storm. Not because of a bit of gay hanky-panky, but of the more serious and illegal goings on. Can I say these things? Definitely not. The royal family (my lower case) are above the law in the UK. So, Charles is gay. Would that explain the lateness of his marriage, and Diana saying he'd never be king? Perhaps also the note to Diana from the duke of Edinburgh - Charlie's dad saying, "how could anybody not fancy her?"

1390 Also posted to: Home page . At: 9:59:38 AM  . .
Permalink  Top  Search Google  Technorati
Other title(s) for this story: Bugger the servants